MURRIETA OPEN FORUM - Get it said, get it read, communications for the community.

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

The Space Shuttle

Would anyone care to comment on the space shuttle? The thing is, it's a lemon. Verner Von Braun screamed when he first heard about the concept. It costs way more than a Saturn V, is far less than what I would call reliable, and all this for the illusion of re-use.

Yes, it has made contributios to research and building the space-station, fixing Hubble, etc., but if you have private individuals building space planes that work, it seems to me that NASA has lost their edge, and they should start looking for a better flagship.

It wasn't the space shuttle that put a man on the moon.

Cameras

Murrieta is considering cameras at certain intersections for law enforcement. I'm on the fence on this one, because I don't believe that Murrieta's stop lights are calibrated yet, and I can picture myself waiting at empty intersections for minutes waiting for a light to change. It might generate revenue for the city though, depending on who they contract with to process the citations.

Monday, July 18, 2005

World news

I read in the comments that at least one of you guys out there would like to debate world issues here, if so, let me know and I will do just that.

In the meantime, Pres. Bush had stated that he would fire anyone in his administration found to have leaked the identity of a covert CIA agent's name. He has since qualified that statement by saying that he would fire any member of his cabinet found in the investigation of the leak who has commited a crime. Carl Rove, his faithful sidekick, has been implicated by Matthew Cooper of Time magazine.

Two interpretations,
1. Bush is confident in his ability to suppress any findings of a federal investigation (see 9-11 commission).
2. The investigation will eventually determine that there is insufficient evidence to charge anyone due to the Bush administration's willingness to exercise the executive privelege whenever the hound get too close.

A Bush without a Rove would be a shadow of his former self.

Eminent domain revisited

At JLM's request, this post is intended to continue discussion about the eminent domain issue. The term "just compensation" is so relative that it can span from "full market value" all the way to "for the good of the community, zero monetary compensation) - the logic here being that the property holder thus victimized, as a citizen for whom losing his/her land was of benefit to the whole, being a member of the whole benefits in turn. — Complicated.

I guess you can chock up those taxes you have paid and the payments you and your families have made over the years to just another form of public service.

Megan's Law

The megan's law website (link in title) shows registered sex offenders in Murrieta, but there is no mention of sober houses. The County Sherriff's Bureau of Corrections —could— be placing violent offenders in these homes to conserve jail space, but the accepted method for relieving overcrowded jails thus far has been early release. I can only assume that the supposed benefit here is to broadcast these offenders, wrists smarting from their small slap, over a wider area as opposed to concentrating them in one house in an upscale residential neighborhood. The logic here escapes me, seemingly the result not of a logical attempt at dealing with the problem, so much as trying to navigate through loopholes in a mound of red tape.

Though Bob Doyle disapproves, Jeff Stone's advocation of reopening old jails and augmenting them with portable units might be the only solution left in our current bureaucracy. After all, substandard buildings with portable trailers are good enough for our children, why aren't they good enough for our criminals?

Murrieta Chamber website

The chamber's new website looks okay, but a click on the weblink logo in the lower right-hand corner replaces the chamber site with the site of weblink international. It would be better for the weblink intl site and any other external links to open in a new window. Rex might want to talk to weblink about that.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Sober Houses

Another e-mail from Barbara Nugent, this one's a little disturbing:

Good Morning Everyone,

This is to let you know that Rescue Murrieta is alive and well, and that we are continuing to be active in the community. We will soon have a new website and I will let you know when that is up and running. Several issues have come up during the past few weeks, and I will be going over these today.

First let me say that the item on the Planning Commission meeting tonight regarding a change to alcohol sales near schools, etc. has been postponed.

Also, the sober house issue will not be an agenda item at the July 19th Council meeting due to an error in public noticing, but concerned citizens will speak during the Public Comments section if you would like to join in that or be present to show your support. More on that follows.

Sober Homes in local neighborhoods.
First of all, those of you who live near the Nutmeg and Jackson corner need to be aware that there is a sober living home in that area.
This home was purchased last October ($519,000) by an owner who lives in Orange County. This sober living home is located on Via Diamante and is 2/10 of a mile from E. H. Curren Elementery School (on Jackson); 2/10 of a mile from a city park (corner of Nutmeg and Jackson) and within 1 mile of Tovashal Elementery School on St. Raphael as well as within 500 ft of homes in The Colony, a senior living community. The proximity to these locations and the nature of the residents that could be living in that sober home makes it imperative that citizens voice their concerns.

On June 22 I attended a meeting in Antelope Run, and the purpose of the meeting was to discuss that sober home. The residents had called Code Enforcement due to the large number of cars parked on the street, unregistered vehicles, a man sleeping in a parked vehicle in front of that house, and the number of people seeming to live in the home. They found out that a sober home could house a variety of individuals, from recovering alcoholics and drug users to parolees, sex offenders and convicted felons. It seems the courts use such homes to house individuals who have drug/alcohol related offenses, often because the jails are overcrowded.

Code Enforcement did go to the home, verified multiple residents, and cited the non-resident owner for violation of local codes regarding operating a group home of this nature with over 6 residents without the proper permit. Such use requires a Conditional Use permit from the city that must be approved, and this process includes a hearing before the Planning Commission which is open to public discussion. It also requires that people living within a 500 foot radius of this type of home must be notified, and that would include many Colony residents.

At the first meeting it was decided that residents would write our Councilmen, City Manger, District Supervisor Jeff Stone and Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth. This was the first notice that our City government and City Council members had that such a home was operating in that area. Those contacts were made and were successful to the extent that our City Manager and councilmen have now been researching these types of homes in communities and seeing what can be done about them. Through research we have learned many other cities across the country have been fighting these homes popping up in residential neighborhoods, some with more success than others. We have also identified city ordinances, etc. that are not being enforced to close down this sober living home as the owners have not been in compliance with any of these, and to date, have not filed the proper paperwork for a business license in a single-family neighborhood or the request for a conditional use permit.

At the second meeting, guests were Tom Rogers from Senator Hollingsworth's office, Councilmen Rick Gibbs and Doug McAllister and Gary Thomasian from the Planning Commission. Each spoke briefly at the meeting and assured residents they had the support of the city in their efforts to rid their neighborhood of the sober house. However, we learned that the owner had notified the city that they were reducing the number of residents to 6 (the city verified there are still over 8 living there), and that would put them in a safe zone, they could operate without applying for a conditional use permit, but they would still need a business permit. The City is now addressing that issue and the residents are continuing their efforts to gather information to support the removal of that use in their neighborhood and are working with Richard Ackerman, a local attorney.

We also learned that incidents of crime have risen sharply in the area. There have been 3 burglaries, a large pumpkin was thrown through the window of a residence, a dog of one of the nearby residents was found dead and skinned in the roadway; obscenities have been shouted to residents when cautioning residents of that home to slow down on the street; and the residents have endured threatening behavior from a few of the residents of the home. Residents of the home have knocked on the doors of homeowners, one at 1 a.m. in the morning where he was told to leave, and that is the home where the pumpkin was tossed through a window the next day. Homeowners are now becoming intimidated and worry about who they will find outside their home when and if they answer a knock or a doorbell.

The residents of Antelope Run are activating their Homeowner Association and officers have been selected that represent all sections of this small neighborhood. Visit their website at http://www.safemurrieta.org/. An interesting note is that the basic Homeowner Association CCRs cover that area, all of the Colony, and other areas along California Oaks.

Our City Council met in an emergency meeting and adopted a resolution putting a moratorium on all sober living homes in our area with over 6 residents, but this meeting and a second such meeting have not resolved the problems with the sober home on Via Diamante. A parole officer who spoke at one of the meetings told us that the courts are using these homes rather than jails more and more. He has visited such homes and stated they do include felons, parolees, and recovering alcohol and drug addicts. For the most part, the homes may operate without incidence, however, recently a resident of a group home in Riverside was convicted of raping a murdering a young pregnant mother in Riverside. You never know when something like this can happen. We do not want it to happen in Murrieta and we must work together to see what options we have to close this one down and prevent others from popping up. By the way, there is another such home in Murrieta, but the address was not published on the site where I found the name.

Look around your neighborhoods. If you see many cars being parked in an area, several residents living in one home, etc. you could have the same situation. These homes are popping up in expensive neighborhoods in Malibu, Pasadena, etc. No neighborhood is immune from the quiet invasion, this is a very profitable business and when parolees and felons are placed in these homes the state and county may pay fees from $1400 a month or more for each resident to live in a very nice neighborhood, have three meals a day, have their rooms taken care of, enjoy backyard pools, etc. This lucrative business can result in monthly incomes of $20,000 or more, at the expense of citizens who are sacrificing to buy homes in safe neighborhoods for their families and then are shocked to find out something like this can happen so easily to disrupt that safe environment.

Please support the citizens living in Antelope Run on this issue. We will be handing out flyers at supermarkets to make people aware that this is happening in Murrieta, we will be speaking at Council meetings, etc. We need everyone to help, so please call to volunteer. If you can help this weekend, let me know as I will be doing the scheduling.

Equestrian Trails in Murrieta area
On a more positive note, we are also working on ensuring that the rural equestrian aura of this area is protected. The City has an ordinance that states the goal of protecting our equestrian and agricultural heritage, and we are working to make sure that happens. The County Board of Supervisors is working to ensure that is happening throughout Riverside County, but right now, the person handling the Trails issue for our district does not have the background or the passion to make sure that the trails that have been identified are kept intact, that the development community is aware of the areas and protects them when building new tracts, etc. We have several people in the Murrieta area who are passionate and knowledgeable on this issue, one is Lyn Mattox who is working on GPS plotting of all our local trails including those in Menifee, Wildomar, etc. I have written Jeff Stone to ask that Lyn be appointed to represent our area and work with our City management team to protect the equestrian trails in this area, and it would be wonderful if all of you joined in this effort. Raising horses in this area has long been a tradition in Murrieta, along with preserving historic buildings, etc., we also need to preserve the industries that have been part of our local history. You do not need to be a horse owner to become involved - we need to work on many different areas to make Murrieta the true gem of the valley, and by keeping part of our rural heritage alive we can do that. If you have any questions or want to volunteer your help and support for this issue, call me.

Upcoming events......
School Board election this year
City Council election 2006
Perhaps ....... an effort to preserve the rural area along Los Alamos (east side of the 215), the hogbacks and other historic aspects there.


Questions? Call me. Barbara Nugent 677-2430

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

Goal Setting Session

Here is what is going to be discussed this Friday at Council goal setting session. Several interesting items - horse trails I - item 5; II - items 8 and 9; several under Planning, etc.

Barbara Nugent

FRIDAY, JULY 15, 2005

9:00 AM

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mayor of the City of Murrieta called a Special Meeting of the Murrieta City Council at the time and place listed above to consider the following matters:

ROLL CALL: Gibbs, McAllister, Ostling, Seyarto, and Enochs

I. PARKS & RECREATION/CSD (1 hour)

1. Youth and Senior Activities (Gibbs/Holston)

2. Permanent Boys and Girls Club Facility in Murrieta (Seyarto)

3. Los Alamos Sports Park Phase 2 - potential uses, funding and timing (Holston)

4. Creation of Murrieta Museum (McAllister/Holston)

5. Parks, Open Space and Trail development and compliance with General Plan (Gibbs/Holston)

6. Designation of site and funding for Veteran's Memorial at Town Square (McAllister/Holston)

7. Maintenance of Gateways into Murrieta (Seyarto/Holston)

ii. PUBLIC SAFETY (45 minutes)

8. Code Enforcement Division staffing and response (Wright)

9. Adoption of Sex Offender Location Ordinance similar to County proposal (Gibbs)

10. Update on zero tolerance for gangs and how to address enforcement with existing resources (McAllister/Wright)

iii. PLANNING I (1 hour)

11. Development Services Case Processing; and improve exhibits for public hearings (McGee)

12. Managed growth rate for residential build-out (Gibbs/McGee)

13. Long Range Planning Projects (McGee)

· Golden Triangle Specific Plan

· Los Alamos District

· Land use study for area bordered by Kalmia, Washington, Magnolia and Jefferson

· Freeway Enhancement Overlay Zones

LUNCH (30 minutes)

PLANNING II (45 minutes)

14. Require up-front infrastructure improvements for residential construction and analysis of adequacy of improvements and mitigation (Enochs)

15. Study of Multiple Use Zones in Murrieta and impacts of elimination (Gibbs/McGee)

16. Presentation on Multi-Family housing locations, numbers and ultimate amount required to meet Housing Element (Gibbs/McGee)

17. Requirement of four vote majority on General Plan amendments (Gibbs)

IV. ADMINISTRATION (1 hour)

18. Expansion of Steering Committee to include district representatives and process for direction to Committee (Gibbs/Ferro)

19. Revised Code of Ethics and process (Gibbs/Vinson)

20. Audit of the City of Murrieta (Gibbs)

21. Address need for enhanced services (Ferro)

22. Analysis of funding of City retirement plan in the future and impacts on the City budget (Gibbs)

23. Recent Supreme Court action on eminent domain and impact on Murrieta; and eminent domain compensation policy options (Gibbs/Seyarto)

24. Potential for Flat Business License Fee (Gibbs/Ferro)

V. PUBLIC WORKS (30 minutes)

25. 2005-2006 Capital Improvement Plan processing and timing (Holston)

26. Analyze ways to improve Traffic Level of Service goal (Gibbs/Holston)

27. Development Impact Fee Revision and update (Gibbs/Holston)

VI. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (1 hour)

28. Restaurant development in the City and incentives for attraction (Gibbs/Moss)

29. Historic Murrieta Downtown Marketing Plan (Vollbrecht)

30. Plan for Industrial/Office attraction of large industries for job creation; and the potential for preserving large parcels for development (Gibbs/Moss)

VII. COMMUNICATIONS (1 hour)

31. Improve Relations with the Murrieta Valley Unified School District (Gibbs/Moss)

32. Expansion of Public Relations and Website updates and interaction capabilities (Vollbrecht)

33. Plan for Council to improve citizen communication (McAllister/Moss)

34. Establish Good Neighbor Policy with Wildomar (Gibbs)

35. Creation of Valley's own television channel/station affiliate (McAllister)

36. Increased participation outside of Murrieta with County, State and Federal representatives (Gibbs/McAllister)

DIRECTION ON OTHER ITEMS

GOVERNING BODY ACTIONS/COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

The Murrieta Insider - July 2005...

... is turning out to be a useful monthly, but I'm not sure what is meant by the slogan "Fair and balanced". Perhaps they ascribe to the same definition of the term that Fox News does for their special brand of neo-conservative twaddle.

But seriously, I do appreciate the P.D. Spotlight, and the community news is nicely done, but the pro-chamber-of-commerce leanings of this paper are sometimes a little hard to swallow. The persistent attempt to rebuild J. VanHaaster's tainted image I cite as an example. At least they used larger type for the "A Paid Advertisement" line in his full page ad.

The most entertaining article this month was an editorial by our illustrious assemblyman Ray Haynes about "The Myth of Global Warming." I asked myself, 'What's this, global issues in a community rag?'

It gradually grew on me while reading his editorial that in the field of science, the esteemed Assemblyman was full of hogwash. At first I became nervous about someone of this intellectual stature holding public office in Sacramento, but as I continued reading I gradually got into the spirit of the spoof, reading on in growing hilarity until I laughed out loud at his punchline “…no matter how you drive your SUV. [sic] So happy motoring...!” What a gas!

The joke is over though, and if Assemblyman Haynes is unwilling to take the time to research the issue of global warming before introducing public commentary on it, then I think the 66th Assembly seat would better be filled by someone of more understanding of global issues.

Saturday, July 02, 2005

Happy Birthday Murrieta


 
Google